Connect with us

Immigration

Biden Admin To Remove Trump-Era Border Security Policy

Published

on

Joe Biden

As the border crisis continues, Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration is reportedly preparing to end a border security policy from former President Trump’s administration.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the “Biden administration plans to end its use of Title 42, a Trump-era pandemic border policy that allows the government to immediately turn away migrants at the southern border, by the end of May.”

“The order, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention plans to issue later this week, says it is taking the step because ‘there is no longer a serious danger’ that migrants would introduce or spread Covid-19 inside immigration detention facilities,” the outlet added.

The CDC is delaying the implementation of the order until the end of May to allow the Department of Homeland Security to prepare for an expected surge in illegal immigration across the southern border this spring.

“Border officials have expressed concern that, without the rapid-turnback policy, they will quickly be overwhelmed by migrants, leading to dangerous overcrowding in border facilities and releases of people into the U.S. who would normally be jailed or deported,” The Wall Street Journal reported.

The end of Title 42 follows a pattern of Biden administration policies that weaken border security. The pattern began shortly after President Biden took office, when he placed restrictions on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that hindered their ability to carry out deporations and caused the agency to be “functionally abolished,” according to a report from The Washington Post.

The Washington Post reported, “ICE under President Biden is an agency on probation. The new administration has rejected calls from some Democrats to eliminate the agency entirely, but Biden has placed ICE deportation officers on a leash so tight that some say their work is being functionally abolished.”

Continue Reading
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. katherine ayers

    March 31, 2022 at 10:06 am

    I’ve been wondering why taxpayers continue to pay the Border Security people at all since they have no power to do their jobs. Somehow the American people need to seek IMPEACHMENT powers to have Joe Biden and Kamala Harris trounced out of their positions! The GOP and a lot of the Democrats need to do their job and show give more tangible care and concern for the state of our affairs. Washington has become a soap opera and it’s time for a lot of the people need to step down and leave the premises!!

  2. Kristal S Kerkondis

    April 2, 2022 at 9:38 pm

    We cannot afford to take in millions of illegal immigrants. The only reason that Biden is doing this is a larger voter base. Every thing that Biden has done has been to destroy America and break her citizens. This country is going under quick. We better step up now before it’s too late. The attempted takeover of our government by progressive Socialist Democrats is a treason /traitor crime. It should be prosecuted and all of them removed, by force, if necessary.

  3. Rosemary

    April 5, 2022 at 2:51 am

    Such a terrible man like the anti Christ hateful

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Immigration

SCOTUS Rules Federal Courts Do Not Have Power To Decide If Illegals Will Be Deported

Published

on

Supreme Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that federal courts do not have the jurisdiction to decide whether noncitizens will be deported or allowed to stay in the country.

The case involved a couple from India — Pankajkumar Patel and his wife, Jyotsnaben, — who illegally entered the United States in the 1990s. They applied for “adjustment of status,” which would have made them both lawful permanent residents. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) denied their request after finding out that Patel intentionally falsely claimed he was a United States citizen in a Georgia driver’s license application.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion for The Court and Justice Neil Gorsuch joining the three leftist justices in dissent.

“Congress has comprehensively detailed the rules by which noncitizens may enter and live in the United States. When noncitizens violate those rules, Congress has provided procedures for their removal,” Barrett wrote. “At the same time, there is room for mercy: Congress has given the Attorney General power to grant relief from removal in certain circumstances.”

“Federal courts have a very limited role to play in this process,” Barrett continued. “With an exception for legal and constitutional questions, Congress has barred judicial review of the Attorney General’s decisions denying discretionary relief from removal. We must decide how far this bar extends—specifically, whether it precludes judicial review of factual findings that underlie a denial of relief. It does.”

The Court ruled that “Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of discretionary-relief proceedings.”

Continue Reading

Immigration

Texas AG Sues To Block Biden DHS Rule On Asylum Seekers At Border

Published

on

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

As the border crisis continues, Texas is seeking to permanently block a new Biden administration rule that allows asylum seekers to avoid deportation at the border.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed the lawsuit on Thursday, requesting the rule be blocked and be declared unconstitutional.

“The last thing TX needs is Biden to make it easy for aliens to break into USA through false claims,” Paxton wrote in a tweet, along with a Fox News article obtaining the lawsuit. “We know what’ll happen when the rule goes into effect: new waves of illegals claiming ‘asylum.’ I’m suing to stop it.”

“Unsatisfied with releasing over 836,225 illegal aliens into the United States within fifteen months—not counting the number of unaccompanied alien children released separately, and aliens who have evaded apprehension—on March 29, 2022, the Defendants promulgated an Interim Final Rule to release even more illegal aliens into our country,” the lawsuit states. “The Interim Rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act (‘APA’), the Homeland Security Act, and the Immigration and Nationality Act (‘INA’), and it violates the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.”

“The State of Texas respectfully requests that this Court issue declaratory, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief,” the lawsuit adds.

The news comes the same day that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) that he did not know if some of the 42 illegal immigrants on the terrorism watch list that were in the custody of border officials had been released into the United States.

“Have any of the 42 illegal migrants on the terrorist watch list or no-fly list encountered on our southwest border been released into the United States?” Jordan asked.

“I will provide that data to you with respect to the disposition of each one,” Mayorkas responded. “I do not know the answer to your question.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List