Connect with us

Nation

House Passes Two Bills For Universal Background Checks

The bills would mandate background checks on all gun purchases

Published

on

House of Representatives

The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives passed two bills on Thursday that would mandate background checks on all gun purchases and prolong the time federal officials may delay the purchase while they perform the background check.

The first bill, H.R. 8 would expand background checks on those attempting to purchase or transfer firearms. H.R. 1446, which is titled the Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021, would eliminate the requirement for federal officials to complete the background check within three days or the purchase would go through, allowing the purchase to be delayed indefinitely while the background check was completed.

The House voted 227-203 in favor of H.R. 8 with eight Republicans siding with House Democrats. H.R. 1446 passed with a slimmer margin of 219-210. The bills are now heading to the Senate where they are expected to fail due to lack of enough support to clear the 60-vote threshold of a Republican filibuster.
The National Rifle Association (NRA) responded to the legislation in a statement, claiming they “are a transparent attempt by gun control advocates in Congress to restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans under the guise of addressing the violent criminal culture in America.”

The NRA states that “H.R. 8, so-called ‘universal’ background checks, cannot be enforced without a federal gun registry, will not prevent crime, and will turn otherwise law-abiding citizens into criminals for simply loaning a firearm to friends or family members.”

“H.R. 1446 could ultimately destroy the Second Amendment rights guaranteed to every law-abiding American by turning it into a privilege enjoyed by a select few,” they added.

“If Congress is serious about the safety of law-abiding citizens, it should have passed concealed carry reciprocity so that Americans can safeguard themselves and their families across state lines and throughout our country during these dangerous times,” the NRA concluded.

Continue Reading
8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. American Patriot

    March 12, 2021 at 10:06 am

    While stronger background checks may help keep guns from the hands of those who would do crime with them, the idea to endlessly hold up the process equates to the identical thing we are witnessing with illegals entering our country. Immigration needs a major overhaul to expediate the process, but it has not occurred. It takes so long for those wanting to come here legally that they are willing to break the law to do it. Same thing will apply with guns. Those who can’t get them legally will pursue other avenues if they have a questionable motive for wanting a gun. This is not the answer…it is overkill and merely creating another problem.

  2. Mark Connolly

    March 12, 2021 at 10:40 am

    The gun grabbin commies aught to try enforcing the laws. There is a law for any type of misuse of a firearm. PAY ATTENTION PEOPLE

  3. Thomas Brown

    March 12, 2021 at 11:05 am

    The “Bill of Rights” does not mean at the whim of the Govt. The 2nd Amendment was to allow us to defend our selves, against a Govt. (political party)gone crazy. Someone needs to send Queen Pelosi a copy of the Constitution and make her take and pass a competency test. If she needs it in Spanish one can be provided.

  4. CrustyOldGeezer

    March 12, 2021 at 12:13 pm

    GUN CONTROL… AGAIN? (he asked incredulously)
    A better plan would be

    FIREARMS TRAINING K-12!

    Teach everybody everything there is to know about all types of weaponry, what damage they cause and how to safely handle them.

    Even starting the next school year, high school graduates could walk off the stage with a diploma AND A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT!

    The Military and Police would have fully trained marksmen.

    With ever increasing numbers of the population being armed, the criminal element will slip back into the shadow and never return.

    ALL crimes from petty crimes to rapes and Murders will drop.

    Overbearing attitudes will fade and People will be more CIVIL to each other.

    The NEED for large police departments will fade as the crime rates drop.

    The ONLY DOWNSIDE would be the LOSS OF POWER THROUGH FEAR BY THE LEFT .

    • Tom Samuelson

      March 12, 2021 at 1:03 pm

      This comment is spot on!!! Thank You!!! The old cliche holds true!!!
      When guns are outlawed only Outlaws will have guns!!! The Dems are out of control!!!

  5. Marco

    March 12, 2021 at 12:46 pm

    Can someone please define “Stronger Background Checks” You can’t, because there’s no such thing. A background check is a background check. Every gun sale has a background check done on it. This insanity that the libs are pushing is for registration and confiscation. We all know it. The sheep who know NOTHING about firearms, including the process of buying one, the 2A, and self-defense, fall right in line with this stupidity because they think it sounds reasonable. Same thing with the “Assualt Weapon” term. Why don’t you have a Demonrat explain to you what and “Assault Weapon” is before you go blindly banning something that isn’t available to the general public if there was such a thing. The military would be the ones that would use any kind of auto fire weapon legally. You CANNOT purchase an “Assault Weapon” from the local gun shop. You want to be the first idiot to go into a gun store and ask to purchase one? Please let me know what store you go to so I can video it and post it for the whole world to see you being laughed out of said gun store. Don’t fall for the tyrants drivel.

  6. Jeff

    March 13, 2021 at 6:45 pm

    A well regulated Militia (COMMA), being necessary to the security of a free State, (COMMA) the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED.

    It is obvious that most in Congress do not know how to read English…. all these Knotheads want to do is INFRINGE on the Right of the PEOPLE!

  7. Ted

    March 18, 2021 at 3:02 pm

    “…allowing the purchase to be delayed indefinitely”

    Unconstitutional. They would just create an “office” for approving requests, and that office would never approve anything, circumventing the constitution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nation

BLM DC Makes Vile Comment about Officers Called ‘Heroes’ When Shot in the Line of Duty

Published

on

BLM

A suspect is still at large after opening fire on police officers in Northwest D.C. Sunday night. One officer was shot, and fortunately suffered non-life-threatening injuries and was released from the hospital after being treated.

Black Lives Matter took the opportunity to make vicious remarks about cops who are targeted. The D.C. Police Department gave a press conference detailing the situation that had occurred and applauded the police department for “courageously” chasing the suspect before he was able to evade police.

The Police Chief asked for citizens to avoid the area where the suspect was last seen and encouraged the public to reach out to their department with any information that could be helpful to the case.

Black Lives Matter took the opportunity to promote its #StopMPD campaign and warn against “copaganda.” Black Lives Matter DC’s official Twitter account posted:

“This is the point we’ve been making for months, Look at the reaction and coverage tonight. Tearjerker press conferences and proclamations of heroes coming soon. Imagine if people knew these folks’ names. Being Black in DC is more dangerous than any job.”

In a follow-up tweet, the account stated “This isn’t to say these scenarios represent what happened tonight, but it does explain our skepticism, interest in details, and highlights the difference in how people talk and act when an officer is hurt vs when they hurt a Black person. No one asks what the cop did wrong.”

Continue Reading

Nation

Another Victim Thrown on NYC Subway Tracks, 62-Year-Old Man Suffered Lacerated Leg

Published

on

NYC Subway

Just over a week ago, 40-year-old Asian American Michelle Alyssa Go was pushed to her death in front of a train on the subway tracks of New York City’s Times Square. Another individual was shoved onto the tracks on Sunday.

New York Police Department said both attacks were unprovoked and called upon leadership officials to do more to protect the city’s citizens. Sunday’s victim was a 62-year-old man whose name has not been publicly released.

He was pushed onto the tracks in Lower Manhattan’s southbound train at the Fulton Street subway station. He sustained a leg laceration and police said there have not yet been any arrests in connection with the incident.

Go’s attacker was identified as Martial Simon, a 61-year-old homeless man with a history of violence and mental health issues. He was charged with second-degree murder. The New York Times reported that shortly before Go’s death, another woman saw him acting suspiciously and later told police she was afraid he was going to push her onto the tracks.

Subway attacks are the latest increase of issues that face Democrat New York Mayor Eric Adams. Adams has pledged to fight crime but has already implemented plans to minimize punishments for criminals in an effort to keep young men, particularly of color, out of prison.

Despite overall subway riding being down since the pandemic, the subway system has seen an increase in assaults last year. “According to the NYPD, 461 felony assaults were reported on the subway system in 2021, of which 30 involved a person being pushed onto the subway tracks. That’s an increase from the year before when there were 26 reported subway-pushing incidents” reports The Washington Post.

New York’s liberal leadership have been vocal supporters of the defund the police movement and saw the city turn to the wild west with protestors taking over the city during the Black Lives Matter movement shortly after George Floyd’s death. Rising crime and gun violence have plagued the city.

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List