Connect with us

Politics

Kamala Harris Complains Her News Coverage Would Be Better If She Was White Man

Published

on

Vice President Kamala Harris is reportedly complaining behind the scenes about the news coverage on her performance, saying that her unprecedented unpopularity is caused by her race and gender.

According to The New York Times, Harris has been “privately” telling her allies that she would get better media coverage if she were any of her 48 white male predecessors.

Harris has even turned to prominent political names like failed 2008 and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton — who was also notoriously unpopular — for advice on her next moves.

“There is a double standard; it’s sadly alive and well,” Clinton told The New York Times. “A lot of what is being used to judge her, just like it was to judge me, or the women who ran in 2020, or everybody else, is really colored by that.”

Harris has also reportedly been complaining about the “difficulties” she has when trying to do the jobs she has been assigned by the White House, like being placed in charge of the illegal immigration crisis at the southern border.

After being placed in charge of the border crisis, Harris took nearly 100 days to visit the border while also falsely claiming on multiple occasions that she had visited the border.

According to The New York Times report, Democrat Representative Henry Cuellar (TX) “said his experiences with Ms. Harris’s team had been disappointing. When Mr. Cuellar heard Ms. Harris was traveling to the border in June, he had his staff call her office to offer help and advice for her visit. He never received a callback.”

“I say this very respectfully to her: I moved on,” Mr. Cuellar told The New York Times. “She was tasked with that job, it doesn’t look like she’s very interested in this, so we are going to move on to other folks that work on this issue.”

Harris has also been the subject of controversy outside of her duties. For example, Harris recently praised a student who had claimed Israel was committing an “ethnic genocide,” saying she was “glad” the student expressed her “truth” and that it “should not be suppressed.”

Continue Reading
18 Comments

18 Comments

  1. BV Nguyen

    December 26, 2021 at 9:09 am

    Same old excuse just like oblahblah always used his skin color to whine about things he didn’t like 🙄 He was and still is the most racist living thing in life 🤢🤮 This woman learned from his 💩💩💩

  2. WILLIAM FLYNN

    December 26, 2021 at 9:16 am

    Playing the RACE CARD is getting old and the general public is fed up with this nonsense. Being INCOMPETENT has NOTHING to do with RACE, COLOR or CREED !! Her ARROGANT attitude and CACKLING Laugh at very serious situations just empathizes the fact that she is NOT a “leader” just an opportunist!

  3. Linda

    December 26, 2021 at 9:57 am

    If she were a white male? Perhaps, like Donald Trump?

  4. Gary Hallas

    December 26, 2021 at 10:51 am

    If you can’t take the heat, get out of the Kitchen

  5. Brian Wilkes

    December 26, 2021 at 11:20 am

    47 white male predecessors. Charles Curtis was a Native American, an enrolled Kaw tribal member.

  6. Linda Petelka

    December 26, 2021 at 11:41 am

    Her coverage would be better is she actually did something for the nation like stop the influx of migrants…but nope..just giggles and does nothing. She’s totally inept and should resign.

  7. BlueBoomerang

    December 26, 2021 at 11:46 am

    Of course Kamala is playing the ‘race card’ and the ‘woman card’. That’s all Democrats know how to. For the BIPOC’s, it’s never their fault. They’re the perpetual ‘victims’ and deserve perpetual special treatment (like they haven’t gotten it since 1965 and the Great Society Program). Harris is inept. She’s cringeworthy. She’s a ‘token’. She’s typical Democrat BIPOC ‘window dressing’ that’s there to pander to a voter base, not “do anything”. I’m sure Harris knows that which is why she’s so pissed off that the press knows that too.

  8. Lisa Bell

    December 26, 2021 at 12:03 pm

    Desperation, does strange things, to powerful elites. The deck they hold is stacked, and their most crooked card is the race one.

  9. willyb

    December 26, 2021 at 2:23 pm

    If that hypothetical “white man” were Donald Trump, and his job performance was comparable to Harris’ record, he’d be roasted in every news broadcast on every major TV network and liberal news rag in the nation. If anything, the mainstream media and press have held their punches for fear of being called racist and anti feminine! Kamala Harris is worse than useless!

    Harris is easily the worst VP in my lifetime…and that includes includes Barkley, Humphrey and Mondale!

  10. Bradfield Clay S

    December 26, 2021 at 3:31 pm

    Her news coverage would certainly be better if she was a competent, hard working, and likable man. Without those three caveats, it would be just the same. Her professional malfunctions have nothing to do with her race or gender. A truly good leader would have the introspective capacity to know that.

    • Ruth J.

      January 2, 2022 at 9:14 am

      Amen. Her coverage would even be much better if she believed in and followed the US Constitution and actually did her job instead of bullying her staff and complaining about her gender and color. It would also help if she would stop cackling when asked a question.

  11. Brian Richard Allen

    December 28, 2021 at 2:12 pm

    …. Kamala Harris complains her news coverage would be better if she was a “white” man ….

    If she was a man of any color, she’d never have made it from Willie Brown’s bed and onto California’s fascist-Marxist “democrats'” ladder to Peter-Principle-Proving promotions so staggeringly-far above and beyond her (mail-room) level of competence.

  12. Joe Dickerson

    December 28, 2021 at 9:41 pm

    I wouldn’t listen to this idiot on the radio if it were the only radio or talk show in the world.
    Ritch Bitch gone tell us poor, hardworking white men what up?
    BS

  13. Connie Bilbrey

    December 30, 2021 at 9:24 am

    Being a white male would not change her, incompetence, lack of skills, lack of training. She failed as a Presidential candidate not because of her ethnicity, she brings nothing to the table. Electing people because of the color of skin, ethnicity or gender is a losing proposition, ie, Lori Lightfoot, Bill DeBlasio, Ilhan Omar, Eric Swalwell, Maxine Waters, Whitmer, Nancy Pelosi and her nephew.

  14. Mark5610

    December 31, 2021 at 9:36 am

    No. You are just lousy at your current job.

  15. Eva Wild

    January 2, 2022 at 9:45 pm

    We don’t care if she’s green, if she were competent. But if it makes you feel better . . . I can imagine all the excuses you used to cover your shortcomings in school and nobody did you any favor by letting you slide.

  16. ThinkTink

    January 3, 2022 at 8:12 am

    She is disliked by blacks and whites. Nothing to do with race. People with a brain know this, people with an agenda to riot, loot, and incite (Maxine) and (Kamala) love the race blame.

  17. Janis McRant

    January 5, 2022 at 10:08 am

    Why,Kamala? Because white men are smarter and harder-working?
    Exception: Pete Buttgag.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Media

National Public Radio Discontinues Reading the Declaration of Inependence

Published

on

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A post by Todd Starnes alerts that National Public Radio (NPR) has ditched its annual ritual of reading the Declaration of Independence. NPR, derisively referred to by Starnes as “National Public Welfare Radio,” announced the cessation of reading the Declaration. Which staffers at the taxpayer-funded radio network had been reading aloud the document since 1988.

The void that would have resulted from not reading the Declaration was not unfilled. “Instead, NPR broadcast an 11-minute conversation about whether or not the Founding Fathers actually meant the words “all men are created equal.” Here’s a link if you’d like to listen to their “screed” (which also reminds us frequently that many of the Founding Fathers owned slaves).

Starnes disclosed that he owns “KWAM, the leading news talk radio station in Memphis, Tennessee. It angers me that my tax dollars are used to prop up a broadcast competitor that spits on our Founding Fathers and our Founding Documents.”

Interestingly, NPR’s newly voiced contempt and cynicism for the Declaration of Independence does not encompass refusing taxpayer-funded government support. Whether or not the Founding Fathers meant what they said and what they wrote may be grist for energetic banter on a radio program that is increasingly committed to shrill progressive virtue signaling. However, the topic of this discussion among smug well-remunerated media activists is irrelevant. The words of the Founding Fathers have been inspirational for two hundred and forty-six years and have been the moral and legal foundation used to free the slaves and develop Constitutional principles to ensure that slavery can never be implemented in this country. Slavery currently exists in several countries now, but NPR is dedicated to ignoring that scourge.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Every Word Of This Is False’: Ted Cruz Factchecks Ilhan Omar’s Attack On Coach Kennedy Prayer Case

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar

On Monday night, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) factchecked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) after she made multiple false claims about the Supreme Court ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, in which the Court ruled 6-3 that a public high school football coach in Washington state had his First Amendment rights violated when he was punished by his school district for praying on the field after games where students could see.

As previously reported, “In 2008, high school football coach Joseph Kennedy began a tradition of praying at midfield after each game. Over time, his players and even members of the opposing team began to join him. In September 2015, a school administrator addressed the matter with Kennedy after an opposing team complained and the coach briefly stopped his prayers.”

“On October 14, 2015, Kennedy told the school district that he was planning on resuming his prayer tradition at the next game. The school district told the coach that his prayers violated the district’s policy, but Kennedy continued to pray at the next two games. The school district subsequently placed him on administrative leave, banned him from participating in the football program, and refused to renew his contract for the following season. Kennedy took the issue to federal district court, arguing that the school district had violated his First Amendment rights,” the report added.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Kennedy, Omar tweeted, “The Supreme Court just ruled that public school teachers can pressure students to join in prayer at public school events but can also retaliate against those that don’t join in. Religious freedom is dead in America.”

“Every word of this is false,” Cruz responded.

Omar’s claim that the Supreme Court’s decision allowed to teachers to “pressure students to join prayer” is false. The Court’s ruling just protected Coach Kennedy’s religious freedom to pray publicly.

Omar was also incorrect in claiming that there would be retaliation against students who did not join Kennedy in prayer – the coach’s tradition of praying after games began with him praying alone at midfield after football games. Kennedy’s school district even noted that Kennedy had “not actively encouraged, or required, participation.”

Additionally, in contrast to Omar’s claim that “religious freedom is dead in America,” the Supreme Court ruling actually strengthened protections of religious freedom.

Writing for the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained, “Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic—whether those expressions take place in a sanctuary or on a field, and whether they manifest through the spoken word or a bowed head.”

“Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance doubly protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment,” Gorsuch added. “And the only meaningful justification the government offered for its reprisal rested on a mistaken view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. Mr. Kennedy is entitled to summary judgment on his First Amendment claims.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List