Connect with us

Politics

Mitch McConnell Defends His ‘Switch’

McConnell and Senate Republicans aren’t going down without a fight, claiming that 2016 was different because the White House and Senate were controlled by different parties.

Published

on

Mitch McConnell

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell clapped back Monday against the Democrats who are continuing to spew vicious allegations of hypocrisy over holding a vote on Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s replacement.

Democrats are accusing McConnell and other Republicans of a major switch up when it comes to the Supreme Court, using McConnells decision to block President Barack Obama’s 2016 nominee, Merrick Garland, as ammunition.

But, McConnell and Senate Republicans aren’t going down without a fight, claiming that 2016 was different because the White House and Senate were controlled by different parties.

According to Politico, in his floor remarks Monday, McConnell argued that the White House and the Senate are now controlled by the same party and thus, the Senate should confirm President Trump’s nominee.

“Apart from that one strange exception, no Senate has failed to confirm a nominee in the circumstances that face us now,” McConnell said, referring to Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, who served on the Court in the 1960s but resigned over ethics issues. “The historical precedent is overwhelming and it runs in one direction.. If our Democratic colleagues want to claim they are outraged, they can only be outraged at the plain facts of American history.”

McConnell continued to highlight that the Senate is simply responding to voters. He noted that Senate Republicans expanded their majority in 2018 after the Supreme Court confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. “Ironically, it was the Democratic leader who went out of his way to declare the 2018 midterms a referendum on the Senate’s handling of the Supreme Court,” McConnel said. “In his final speech before Kavanaugh was confirmed, he yelled over and over at the American people to ‘go vote!’ He told Americans to go elect senators based on how they’d approached their advice-and-consent duties over those weeks. Unfortunately for him, many Americans did just that.”

But, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer rebutted, saying the majority leader and Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are “making a mockery” of their previous position.

“Why not just come to the floor and say I’m going to do whatever is best for my political party, consistency be damned, reason be damned, democracy be damned,” Schumer said. “They know there is no reason, no reason, no argument, no logic to justify flipping your position 180 degrees and calling it some kind of principle. It is not.”

In the contentious battle of then-versus-now, “Republicans argue that Democrats called for the confirmation of Garland during an election year, but Democrats say that with the Garland nomination, Republicans set a new standard,” according to Politico.

While McConnell is facing the brunt of these accusations since Ginsburg’s death on Friday, Graham, who is up for reelection, has faced his own sweep of relentless accusations of hypocrisy.

The South Carolina Republican, who said he would not confirm a nominee during the Kavanaugh confirmation, has since said he would vote for a nominee during an election year. But he too has spoken out, saying he changed his mind after the ugly confirmation process for Kavanaugh. .

With Trump’s announcement coming Friday or Saturday, McConnell and Schumer’s grueling squabble is only the beginning of what will be a brutal Supreme Court fight. McConnell has made it clear that Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the Senate floor, whether before or after the election, while Schumer said that at no time in the Senate’s history have they confirmed a Supreme Court nominee so close to a presidential election, which is 43 days away.

As expected, though, McConnell did not back down, referencing the confirmation of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who was confirmed in 33 days.

While the battle is just beginning, there is ultimately little the Democrats can do to stop the nomination from going through. With the White House and Senate being controlled by Republicans, Democrats will be forced to sit back and let it happen.

But, there will be consequences. Democrats say if Republicans move forward, they will “fundamentally change the Senate as an institution,” according to Politico.

“How can we trust each other if when push comes to shove, when the stakes are the highest, the other side will double-cross their own standards when it’s politically advantageous,” Schumer said. “Tell me how this would not spell the end of this supposedly great deliberative body.”

As the nominee announcement inches closer, the Democrat-Republican drama will continue to unfold, and it’s clear that neither side will back down without a fight.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COVID-19

BLM Leader Vows to ‘Abolish’ NYC Mayor De Blasio’s Vax Passports

Says ‘Free Pass to Racism’,  ‘Modern-Day Freedom Papers’

Published

on

Chivona Newsome

New York Mayor Bill De Blasio’s vaccine mandates and consequential vaccine passports necessary to enter most bars and restaurants in the city are being dubbed racist by a Black Lives Matter leader.

Chivona Newsome co-founded the Greater New York Chapter of BLM and also ran as a congressional candidate in 2020 for New York’s 15th district sent a statement to Fox News explaining the claims of racism.

“Although Mayor Bill De Blasio ran on progressives values, nothing in his tenure will attest to his campaign promises,” Newsome stated. “The September 13th vaccine mandate is racist and specifically targets Black New Yorkers. The vaccination passports are modern-day Freedom Papers, which limit the free will of Black people.”

De Blasio’s mandates went into effect September 13, ordering indoor establishments making patrons show proof of vaccination before entering. Businesses can face fines up to $5,000 for not complying. On September 20, the Mayor’s office announced it had already issued 3,200 warnings to businesses in the first week.

Newsome continued, “The vaccination mandates infringe upon the civil liberties of the Black community…It’s more than where we can dine or enjoy entertainment, it will result in loss of income. As of Monday, September 27, Black health care workers and educators will lose their jobs.”

Newsome’s concerns for minorities and repercussions such as losing jobs is the same reasoning hundreds of groups and unions across the country have stood up against Biden’s vaccine mandate. Postal workers, Police unions, Nurse Unions and Hospital administrators are all amongst those expressing outrage.

Newsome says De Blasio’s actions are a direct attack on black Americans, and he “chose to disenfranchise and force the very people who elected him into poverty and second-class citizenship.”

She explained that de Blasio is, “fully aware of the hesitancy and distrust people of African descent have about vaccination and their interactions with government and law enforcement.” Newsome concluded, “the vaccination passport will not be a free pass to racism. Our organization pledges to demonstrate until the vaccine mandate is abolished.”

Continue Reading

Immigration

Democrat Pushes Back On False Claim Border Patrol Agents Whipped Migrants

Published

on

Henry Cuellar

During a CNN interview on Tuesday, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) pushed back on false claims by other Democrat lawmakers that U.S. Border Patrol agents riding horses were swinging whips at illegal immigrants trying to cross the southern border.

CNN anchor Victor Blackwell pushed the false information during, saying the Border Patrol agents were hitting migrants with what “appears to use what looks like a rope or a lasso” and then asking Cuellar for his reaction.

“Well, you know, certainly, we got to make sure we treat all the immigrants with respect and dignity,” Cuellar responded. “But I will say this, Border Patrol has had those horse brigades for a while, they’ve had them for a while, number one. Number two, they don’t carry whips. And they do not carry lassos. I think the picture you’re talking about, at least the one I’ve seen is the rein, the rein of the horses.”

“And should those be used? Should those be used should even if it is a rein?” Blackwell asked.

“Well, again, if there was a problem, it should be investigated,” Cuellar responded. “And I think that’s it, but we cannot paint the Border Patrol with that same type of paintbrush. Look, you know, what are they supposed to do? Just stand there and let everybody come in? You know, they’re supposed to be enforcing the law, but again, as to how you enforce the law, you got to make sure you treat people with dignity and respect.”

The CNN interview came after a video surfaced of illegal immigrants attempting to evade U.S. Border Patrol agents on horses and run into the country. In response, many Democrats falsely declared that the agents were using whips on the migrants – despite the fact that Border Patrol agents do not carry whips and there being zero evidence any of the agents struck any of the migrants.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), for example, tweeted, “The images of inhumane treatment of Haitian migrants by Border Patrol—including the use of whips—are unacceptable They are fleeing violence and natural disaster and seeking protection in our country The Administration must uphold our refugee laws and stop Title 42 deportations.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List