Connect with us

Politics

Pennsylvania Democrat Proposes Three-Child Limit Bill

Published

on

Chris Rabb

A new bill is set to be introduced in Pennsylvania that will limit the number of children men can have to three. The bill would mandate vasectomies for men at age 40 or after their third child, whichever comes first.

Democrat State Rep. Chris Rabb (Philadelphia), the bill’s author, says it is “parody legislation” of the recent Texas anti-abortion law, which bans abortions after the baby’s heart activity can be detected. Rabb says the bill is meant to highlight a “gendered double standard.”

“To each person who views this bill I’ve introduced as absurd, I’d urge you to apply equal scrutiny to laws in places like Texas and right here in Pennsylvania, which enact paternalistic restrictions on the personal liberty of its women, trans men and nonbinary individuals who have an unwanted pregnancy,” Rabb said.

Politifact reported, “The proposed bill detailed in the memo also contains an enforcement provision explicitly patterned off the Texas abortion law, SB 8. Instead of making a violation a crime punishable by local or state government, it offers a $10,000 reward to any Pennsylvanians who report ‘scofflaws who have not complied with this statute within the allotted timeframe.’ It would also allow Pennsylvanians to take civil action against men who wrongfully conceive a child with them.”

A key difference between Rabb’s bill and the Texas bill is that Rabb’s bill is designed to prevent the creation of a new human life, while the Texas bill is designed to prevent the ending of a new human life.
The bill appears to be more similar to Communist China’s recent
three-child policy, an eerie likeness due to the self-admitted socialists in the Democratic party.

Continue Reading
20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. D

    October 8, 2021 at 9:35 am

    In case they have all forgotten, THEY WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, not the other way around. Stop dictating and making your own suggestions and rules and do the jobs you were actually elected to do. All of this is nonsense. Pennsylvania folks, this is your state & you are all capable of better representation than this.

  2. Steve stein

    October 8, 2021 at 9:40 am

    Chris Rabbs latest bill limiting how many children we can have shows what a moron this racist democrat is. Vote every democrat out of office before they control everything you do.

  3. Tom Fisher

    October 8, 2021 at 9:52 am

    This would devastate the NBA.

    • Douglas J Deleruyelle

      October 15, 2021 at 10:22 am

      👍😂

  4. Tam

    October 8, 2021 at 10:27 am

    I don’t know who’s the bigger idiot. This guy or the folks who voted him in. First off there’s a hundred ways to keep from getting pregnant now a days, second the Dems want to allow abortions all the up to seven and eight months pregnant. Unless it’s a medical emergency it’s wrong, it’s flat out murdering a child!! So for all you folks that want to go out have a good time either don’t have sex or take precautions!!! Abortions should only be done when absolutely necessary (medical, rape, incest).
    This guy shouldn’t be even holding office with a mentally like he has!!

  5. John Poelstra

    October 8, 2021 at 10:52 am

    If Democrats are looking for moral equivalency to the Texas antiabortion law they have sourly missed the mark. I would suggest that this proposal is hypocritical as the Democrats continue to allow millions of illegal aliens into our nation. Now that’s moral equivalency.

  6. Markham Soares

    October 8, 2021 at 12:37 pm

    This is America not China 🇨🇳 what wrong with the lawmakers this we are turning this country into socialism community, so off.👎🏻

  7. Marc

    October 8, 2021 at 2:59 pm

    Where do these Bozo’s come from?

  8. Lisa J Burk

    October 8, 2021 at 6:29 pm

    This IS NOT China, what are you trying to do. Americans will not stand for this. And again a democrat trying to turn us into a socialist and communist nation. NO.

  9. Patricia Noack

    October 8, 2021 at 7:05 pm

    Are they out their minds. Who the hell are we now China. This is America. Who the hell are they to try and tell you how many children you can have.

  10. Deb watkins

    October 8, 2021 at 7:11 pm

    Holy China, Batman! Is this man blind?!

  11. ann

    October 8, 2021 at 9:52 pm

    Snowball effect of an out of control mandate…………Next “End of Life” shots?
    This sounds like a “Bill Gates” request; as he gave a speech suggesting “vaccines would prevent overpopulation”.

  12. Vindi

    October 8, 2021 at 11:03 pm

    Where do these people come up with ideas like this? This madness needs to stop NOW! If you don’t like the law, move out of the state. This is the United States of America. When will the united part comes back to life in the minds of politicians?

    We can see you being stupid on the TV set all the time! Just stop it and get inspired to do something to Build Back Better?

  13. Cathy

    October 8, 2021 at 11:04 pm

    Communism!
    Government now telling us how large our family should be.
    NO!!!!!!!!

  14. Christine Voorhees

    October 9, 2021 at 10:47 am

    Communism is coming …..

  15. Damma Stevens

    October 9, 2021 at 4:10 pm

    In one sense, I might agree- IF it stated “Any man who has fathered 3 ILLIGITIMATE children, or is not paying sufficient child support to provide for them!

  16. MRC

    October 9, 2021 at 8:43 pm

    I thought these norons believed in ” my body my choice.” Dems are not only really dumb.
    They’re incredibly narcissistic

  17. Rik Venerable

    October 10, 2021 at 9:00 am

    A direct hit on his own constituency. What about when it’s the woman’s 4th but the mans 1st. Can the man then sue the woman for aborting the child he wanted. Since the left promotes equality, does the mandatory mandates include woman and require her to have her tubes tied at 40. Just simple questions for a simple minded politician.

  18. Chad

    October 11, 2021 at 12:38 pm

    A more direct comparison would be to say that the man must kill the illegal children. Oh wait….

  19. Douglas J Deleruyelle

    October 15, 2021 at 10:26 am

    Just men huh. So I’m assuming that women would be allowed as many as they like. Well it would increase genetic diversity. Sorry folks just a this is just a joke, but the fact that we’re copying policies from China is truly scary to me. Better get ready people because socialism and communism are on their way. Since we’ve dumbed down our educational system the bulk of the populace these days are nothing more than sheep.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

POLL: Huge One Year Swing of Independent Voters Saying Government ‘Doing too Much’

Published

on

White House

What a difference a year can make. Particularly a year filled with government infringements and overreaching. In a Gallup poll released Thursday, findings show Americans have drastically shifted perspective on how much they want the government involved in their lives.

Gallup News tweeted the results along with the headline “Americans again favor a reduced government role in solving problems facing the country after supporting a more active government role last year.”

52% percent of those polled say the government is doing too much on issues that should be dealt with by businesses and individuals. Only 43% say the government needs to do more to address citizens’ problems.

The numbers have almost flopped from only one year ago when 54% said the government should be doing more, and 41% disagreed. The annual Gallup Governance survey was conducted September 1-17.

The Gallup Poll release stated “the shift toward favoring a more active government role in 2020 was seen among Democrats and independents but not Republicans — likely a response to the coronavirus pandemic and in particular to then-President Donald Trump’s approach to handling it.”

“Trump generally opposed government efforts designed to slow the spread of the virus, such as face mask requirements and business and school closures.” The poll found independent voters shifted their opinions greatly.

“The percentage of independents who said the government’s doing too many things jumped from 38% in 2020 to 57% this year. Republicans edged up from 74% to 80% and Democrats crept up from 13% to 18%.”

Gallup also highlighted the fact that 2020 was only the second time in the poll’s 29 years of asking about the role of government that at least half of Americans supported an active role for government. The first time occurred in 2001 in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Continue Reading

Politics

Former Obama Ethics Chief Slams Psaki Over Dismissing Questions On Hunter Biden

Published

on

Walter Shaub

Walter Shaub, the former head of the federal government’s ethics office under President Barack Obama, slammed White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday in response to her dismissal of questions about whether the identity of buyers for Hunter Biden’s art would stay anonymous.

“At least five prints of Hunter Biden’s artwork have already been sold for $75,000 each and a team of lawyers is vetting potential patrons who plan to attend his upcoming gallery show in New York City — which has now been delayed until the spring,” The New York Post reported last week. “It’s unclear who purchased the reproductions — which cost a fraction of the top price of $500,000 for an original piece by President Biden’s scandal-scarred son — or if any more were sold after the LA show opened.”

During Tuesday’s press briefing, Psaki told a reporter asking about the anonymity of the buyers of Hunter Biden’s art, “I know this is your favorite topic, but it, again — it still is the purview of the gallerist. We still do not know and will not know who purchases any paintings. And the President remains proud of his son.”

 

“These are legitimate questions,” Shaub said in response to Psaki’s comments. “It’s disappointing to hear [Psaki] send a message that the WH thinks the public has no right to ask about ethics. After the last 4 years, these questions have never been more important. I know this isn’t a popular opinion, but this stuff matters.”

“There is no ethics program in the world that can be built around the head of state’s staff working with a dealer to keep the public in the dark about the identities of individuals who pay vast sums to the leader’s family member for subjectively priced items of no intrinsic value,” Shaub tweeted Wednesday. “If this were Trump, Xi [Jinping] or [Vladimir] Putin, you’d have no doubt whatsoever that this creates a vehicle for funneling cash to the first family in exchange for access or favors. Nor would you doubt that the appearance of monetizing the presidency was outrageous.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List