Connect with us

Politics

Pennsylvania Democrat Proposes Three-Child Limit Bill

Published

on

Chris Rabb

A new bill is set to be introduced in Pennsylvania that will limit the number of children men can have to three. The bill would mandate vasectomies for men at age 40 or after their third child, whichever comes first.

Democrat State Rep. Chris Rabb (Philadelphia), the bill’s author, says it is “parody legislation” of the recent Texas anti-abortion law, which bans abortions after the baby’s heart activity can be detected. Rabb says the bill is meant to highlight a “gendered double standard.”

“To each person who views this bill I’ve introduced as absurd, I’d urge you to apply equal scrutiny to laws in places like Texas and right here in Pennsylvania, which enact paternalistic restrictions on the personal liberty of its women, trans men and nonbinary individuals who have an unwanted pregnancy,” Rabb said.

Politifact reported, “The proposed bill detailed in the memo also contains an enforcement provision explicitly patterned off the Texas abortion law, SB 8. Instead of making a violation a crime punishable by local or state government, it offers a $10,000 reward to any Pennsylvanians who report ‘scofflaws who have not complied with this statute within the allotted timeframe.’ It would also allow Pennsylvanians to take civil action against men who wrongfully conceive a child with them.”

A key difference between Rabb’s bill and the Texas bill is that Rabb’s bill is designed to prevent the creation of a new human life, while the Texas bill is designed to prevent the ending of a new human life.
The bill appears to be more similar to Communist China’s recent
three-child policy, an eerie likeness due to the self-admitted socialists in the Democratic party.

Continue Reading
20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. D

    October 8, 2021 at 9:35 am

    In case they have all forgotten, THEY WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, not the other way around. Stop dictating and making your own suggestions and rules and do the jobs you were actually elected to do. All of this is nonsense. Pennsylvania folks, this is your state & you are all capable of better representation than this.

  2. Steve stein

    October 8, 2021 at 9:40 am

    Chris Rabbs latest bill limiting how many children we can have shows what a moron this racist democrat is. Vote every democrat out of office before they control everything you do.

  3. Tom Fisher

    October 8, 2021 at 9:52 am

    This would devastate the NBA.

    • Douglas J Deleruyelle

      October 15, 2021 at 10:22 am

      👍😂

  4. Tam

    October 8, 2021 at 10:27 am

    I don’t know who’s the bigger idiot. This guy or the folks who voted him in. First off there’s a hundred ways to keep from getting pregnant now a days, second the Dems want to allow abortions all the up to seven and eight months pregnant. Unless it’s a medical emergency it’s wrong, it’s flat out murdering a child!! So for all you folks that want to go out have a good time either don’t have sex or take precautions!!! Abortions should only be done when absolutely necessary (medical, rape, incest).
    This guy shouldn’t be even holding office with a mentally like he has!!

  5. John Poelstra

    October 8, 2021 at 10:52 am

    If Democrats are looking for moral equivalency to the Texas antiabortion law they have sourly missed the mark. I would suggest that this proposal is hypocritical as the Democrats continue to allow millions of illegal aliens into our nation. Now that’s moral equivalency.

  6. Markham Soares

    October 8, 2021 at 12:37 pm

    This is America not China 🇨🇳 what wrong with the lawmakers this we are turning this country into socialism community, so off.👎🏻

  7. Marc

    October 8, 2021 at 2:59 pm

    Where do these Bozo’s come from?

  8. Lisa J Burk

    October 8, 2021 at 6:29 pm

    This IS NOT China, what are you trying to do. Americans will not stand for this. And again a democrat trying to turn us into a socialist and communist nation. NO.

  9. Patricia Noack

    October 8, 2021 at 7:05 pm

    Are they out their minds. Who the hell are we now China. This is America. Who the hell are they to try and tell you how many children you can have.

  10. Deb watkins

    October 8, 2021 at 7:11 pm

    Holy China, Batman! Is this man blind?!

  11. ann

    October 8, 2021 at 9:52 pm

    Snowball effect of an out of control mandate…………Next “End of Life” shots?
    This sounds like a “Bill Gates” request; as he gave a speech suggesting “vaccines would prevent overpopulation”.

  12. Vindi

    October 8, 2021 at 11:03 pm

    Where do these people come up with ideas like this? This madness needs to stop NOW! If you don’t like the law, move out of the state. This is the United States of America. When will the united part comes back to life in the minds of politicians?

    We can see you being stupid on the TV set all the time! Just stop it and get inspired to do something to Build Back Better?

  13. Cathy

    October 8, 2021 at 11:04 pm

    Communism!
    Government now telling us how large our family should be.
    NO!!!!!!!!

  14. Christine Voorhees

    October 9, 2021 at 10:47 am

    Communism is coming …..

  15. Damma Stevens

    October 9, 2021 at 4:10 pm

    In one sense, I might agree- IF it stated “Any man who has fathered 3 ILLIGITIMATE children, or is not paying sufficient child support to provide for them!

  16. MRC

    October 9, 2021 at 8:43 pm

    I thought these norons believed in ” my body my choice.” Dems are not only really dumb.
    They’re incredibly narcissistic

  17. Rik Venerable

    October 10, 2021 at 9:00 am

    A direct hit on his own constituency. What about when it’s the woman’s 4th but the mans 1st. Can the man then sue the woman for aborting the child he wanted. Since the left promotes equality, does the mandatory mandates include woman and require her to have her tubes tied at 40. Just simple questions for a simple minded politician.

  18. Chad

    October 11, 2021 at 12:38 pm

    A more direct comparison would be to say that the man must kill the illegal children. Oh wait….

  19. Douglas J Deleruyelle

    October 15, 2021 at 10:26 am

    Just men huh. So I’m assuming that women would be allowed as many as they like. Well it would increase genetic diversity. Sorry folks just a this is just a joke, but the fact that we’re copying policies from China is truly scary to me. Better get ready people because socialism and communism are on their way. Since we’ve dumbed down our educational system the bulk of the populace these days are nothing more than sheep.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Politics

‘Every Word Of This Is False’: Ted Cruz Factchecks Ilhan Omar’s Attack On Coach Kennedy Prayer Case

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar

On Monday night, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) factchecked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) after she made multiple false claims about the Supreme Court ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, in which the Court ruled 6-3 that a public high school football coach in Washington state had his First Amendment rights violated when he was punished by his school district for praying on the field after games where students could see.

As previously reported, “In 2008, high school football coach Joseph Kennedy began a tradition of praying at midfield after each game. Over time, his players and even members of the opposing team began to join him. In September 2015, a school administrator addressed the matter with Kennedy after an opposing team complained and the coach briefly stopped his prayers.”

“On October 14, 2015, Kennedy told the school district that he was planning on resuming his prayer tradition at the next game. The school district told the coach that his prayers violated the district’s policy, but Kennedy continued to pray at the next two games. The school district subsequently placed him on administrative leave, banned him from participating in the football program, and refused to renew his contract for the following season. Kennedy took the issue to federal district court, arguing that the school district had violated his First Amendment rights,” the report added.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Kennedy, Omar tweeted, “The Supreme Court just ruled that public school teachers can pressure students to join in prayer at public school events but can also retaliate against those that don’t join in. Religious freedom is dead in America.”

“Every word of this is false,” Cruz responded.

Omar’s claim that the Supreme Court’s decision allowed to teachers to “pressure students to join prayer” is false. The Court’s ruling just protected Coach Kennedy’s religious freedom to pray publicly.

Omar was also incorrect in claiming that there would be retaliation against students who did not join Kennedy in prayer – the coach’s tradition of praying after games began with him praying alone at midfield after football games. Kennedy’s school district even noted that Kennedy had “not actively encouraged, or required, participation.”

Additionally, in contrast to Omar’s claim that “religious freedom is dead in America,” the Supreme Court ruling actually strengthened protections of religious freedom.

Writing for the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained, “Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic—whether those expressions take place in a sanctuary or on a field, and whether they manifest through the spoken word or a bowed head.”

“Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance doubly protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment,” Gorsuch added. “And the only meaningful justification the government offered for its reprisal rested on a mistaken view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. Mr. Kennedy is entitled to summary judgment on his First Amendment claims.”

Continue Reading

Nation

Leo Terrell: Not One Democrat Can Justify Roe V. Wade

Published

on

Leo Terrell: Not One Democrat Can Justify Roe V. Wade

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List