Connect with us


Senate Passes Bill to Make Daylight Savings Permanent Beginning November 2023



Legislation first introduced in 2019 by Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) was passed in the Senate and now heads to the House. The legislation would make Daylight Saving Time permanent across the U.S.

If passed, the change will take effect in November of 2023 so as not to impose the transportation industry’s schedules which are already working off of the existing time and are planned in advance.

Rubio said “it’s an idea whose time has come.” The measure received bipartisan support in the Senate and had both Republican and Democrat co-sponsors. Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island was the lead sponsor for the Dems.

“You’ll see it’s an eclectic collection of members of the United States Senate in favor of what we’ve just done here in the Senate, and that’s to pass a bill to make Daylight Savings Time permanent,” Rubio said on the Senate floor. “Just this past weekend, we all went through that biannual ritual of changing the clock back and forth and the disruption that comes with it. And one has to ask themselves after a while why do we keep doing it?”

“If we can get this passed, we don’t have to keep doing this stupidity anymore,” he added. “We can’t always get bipartisan agreement in Congress these days, but here’s one thing we can agree on: we could all use a bit more sunshine,” the pair wrote. “That’s why we’re working together in the US Senate to make sure we end the practice of ‘spring forward’ and ‘fall back’ by making daylight saving time permanent.”

Just last week Senators Rubio and Markey wrote an op-ed published on CNN explaining how dark afternoons in winter negatively impact mental and physical health. Additionally, changing clocks twice a year disrupts sleeping patterns which is vital to good health.

“The rate of heart attacks spikes by 24 [percent] in the days following ‘spring forward’ in March, according to a 2014 study from the University of Michigan. Another study, published in 2016, found stroke rates may also increase by eight percent,” the senators wrote. “Year-round daylight saving time could also decrease the likelihood of fatal car accidents, which jump six percent in the days following the time change, according to a 2020 study from the University of Colorado.”

Continue Reading


  1. Mary

    March 17, 2022 at 9:37 am

    I agree with stopping this clock changing stupidity but being from Indiana, I do not support Daylight Savings time for us. Indiana needs to go back to Central time. From whatever state you live in just use the sun to determine what time zone you should be in. When the sun is full up at noon it is 12noon. That is your time zone. Currently in Indiana the noon time zone is at 2pm. We are two hours ahead of our time zone.

  2. Chet Brown

    March 17, 2022 at 9:55 am

    This is the only nation in the world trying to change time itself. What happened to the billions of people before man started playing God and manipulating time? What do these idiots have to say about it being dark at 9am in November? It says in the Bible that Satan and his minions will try to change time itself. What does Rubio have to say about that?

  3. Janet Pagano

    March 17, 2022 at 10:28 am

    Finally agree it is so disrupted to our lives. Thank you Sen. Rubio😇😇😇

  4. Marlo Kunze

    March 17, 2022 at 8:48 pm

    Arizona doesn’t do DST. Where does that put our state? Constantly on Cal time or Utah time?

  5. David Lary

    March 18, 2022 at 12:19 pm

    We should get rid of daylight savings time entirely.

  6. WillyB

    March 18, 2022 at 12:26 pm

    Yes, changing our clocks twice a year is a major hardship that making school kids wait for their bus in the dark in December and January is a small price to pay. Besides, this will extend the golf season for congress, as they’ll now be able to get in 18 holes after their workday ends at 3pm.

  7. Marc

    March 18, 2022 at 1:28 pm

    This sounds good, but it won’t work in all regions. Just because they complain about it being dark in the morning, is not enough to justify the permanent change to DST. For one thing, in my neck of the woods, the summers are HOT! I don’t want to wait until just about 9pm in the middle of summer for the sun to set. When it’s 115 to 120 degrees, you want that sun to set as soon as possible. So, if they want to keep it at standard time, then we can talk.

  8. John Bagwell

    March 23, 2022 at 10:53 am

    What a dumb idea. If you want more sunshine after normal work hours then change the time to go to work to 7 am . The original reason for daylight savings was to allow farmers kids more time to work the farm fields. How many of you are farmers kids who work the fields? Also i challenge everybody to come to Phoenix Az when the summertime temperatures can range as high as 122 degrees and tell me that you want more sunshine.

  9. Steven A. Oldham

    March 29, 2022 at 11:52 pm

    This legislation is concerned about the “spring forward” health effects, which makes sense.

    However, perhaps the legislators have not checked to see whether permanent daylight savings time or permanent standard would be best, as other scientific evidence prefers permanent standard time over permanent daylight savings time to limit health effects.
    Or possibly a “split the difference” approach would be better, 1/2 hour ahead of standard time and 1/2 hour behind regular time.

    Perhaps these issues will be ironed out in the legislative process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Pro-Abortion Extremists Threaten To Burn Down Supreme Court, Murder Justices, DHS Memo Reveals



Pro-abortion extremists are reportedly threatening to burn down the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their clerks following the leak of a draft of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion intending to overturn Roe v. Wade.

According to a May 13 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memo obtained by Axios, the “U.S. government is bracing for a potential surge in political violence once the Supreme Court hands down the ruling that’s expected to overturn Roe v. Wade… Law enforcement agencies are investigating social-media threats to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their clerks, as well as attacks targeting places of worship and abortion clinics.”

The memo says the threats “are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the Court’s official ruling.”

However, the memo notes that the “mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics does not constitute domestic violent extremism or illegal activity and is constitutionally protected.”

A DHS spokesperson told Axios that the department “is committed to protecting Americans’ freedom of speech and other civil rights and civil liberties, including the right to peacefully protest.”

“[The] DHS is also committed to working with our partners across every level of government and the private sector to share timely information and intelligence, prevent all forms of violence, and to support law enforcement efforts to keep our communities safe,” the spokesperson added.

Earlier this month, a draft of a Supreme Court’s majority opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to Politico.

In the draft, Justice Samuel Alito writes that “Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito added. “Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and de

Continue Reading


Florida Gov Signs Law Making It Illegal To Protest Outside An Individual’s Home



Ron DeSantis

On Monday, Republican Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill that makes it a crime to protest outside an individual’s home.

“Sending unruly mobs to private residences, like we have seen with the angry crowds in front of the homes of Supreme Court justices, is inappropriate,” DeSantis said. “This bill will provide protection to those living in residential communities and I am glad to sign it into law.”

The law will go into effect on October 1, and once “this law takes effect, law enforcement officers will provide a warning to any person picketing or protesting outside of a dwelling and will make arrests for residential picketing only if the person does not peaceably disperse after the warning. Residential picketing will be punishable as a second-degree misdemeanor,” DeSantis’ office explained.

“It is unlawful for a person to picket or protest before or about the dwelling of any person with the intent to harass or disturb that person in his or her dwelling,” the text of the bill says. “Before a person may be arrested for a violation of this section, a law enforcement officer… or a local, state, federal, or military law enforcement agency must go as near to the person as may be done with safety and shall command any person picketing or protesting before or about the dwelling of a person to immediately and peaceably disperse. If any such person does not thereupon immediately and peaceably disperse, he or she may be arrested for a violation of this section.”

The new law comes in response to leftist protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices following the leak of a draft of a Supreme Court majority opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to Politico.

“Roughly 100 protesters appeared outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s house, where they carried signs and chanted slogans before walking a half-mile to Chief Justice John Roberts’s home, then back to Kavanaugh’s home, where police ordered them to leave the area,” The Washington Examiner reported last week.

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List