Politics

TERRELL: ‘Barack Obama is a dinosaur within the democratic party’

“Barack Obama is a dinosaur within the democratic party,” Terrell said. “He is wrestling with the word ‘defund the police.’”

Published

1 year ago

December 17, 2020

Team Leo

After facing backlash from radical progressives, Barack Obama walked back and tried to clarify his criticism of the “defund the police” narrative.

“If we say defund the police, not just white folks but Michelle’s mom might say, ‘if I’m getting robbed, who am I going to call and is someone going to show up?’,” Obama said.

Leo Terrell appeared on Hannity Wednesday, live from the nation’s capital, to discuss the former president’s comments.

“Barack Obama is a dinosaur within the democratic party,” Terrell said. “He is wrestling with the word ‘defund the police,’” he added.

“Defunding the police, according to the democrats, is to eliminate the police,” he added.

Terrell urged that police protection is not an issue based on race, rather it’s an American issue.

“The race issue, it’s not a question about Michelle’s mom and white people. Police protection is an American issue,” he said. “It’s not an issue based on race.”

Terrell said Obama is trying to walk back his comments because he is out of step with the new, socialist democratic party.

“And what he’s trying to do is walk it back because he’s out of step with the democratic party. They want to eliminate the police. Minnesota, L.A., the vice president-elect took away 150 million dollars, she supported it,” he said. “So the issue of defunding the police, that’s what the democrats want to do and Barack Obama is having a hard time with this new socialist democratic party,” he added.

Terrell arrived in Washington D.C. Wednesday and said he will deliver one of his Leo 2.0 hats to President Trump.

“I’m in Washington D.C. at the Trump Hotel and I got the gift that you, Larry and I decided to give President Trump tomorrow. I’ll deliver this to him tomorrow.”

2 Comments

Duties

December 18, 2020 at 1:40 pm

Leo Terrell 2.0 is the most notable conversion since Reagan switched from the Dems to the GOP in the 1960s.

Reply
Jose

December 19, 2020 at 10:48 am

Obama should be thrilled. After America showing not once, but twice they weren’t too racist to vote a black man President, he injected his own racism into society and convinced weaklings we are systematically racist. Now he needs to go quietly and STFU. He succeeded on ruining the country he spent so many years learning to hate is Reverend Weight’s church.

Reply

Politics

Sen. Sinema Appears To Quickly Pull A U-Turn After Seeing Biden

Published

14 hours ago

January 15, 2022

Team Terrell

Kyrsten Sinema

Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) – who dealt a potentially fatal blow to the Democrats’ election reform legislation by refusing President Biden’s push to reform Senate filibuster rules – appears to have avoided Biden as he spoke to reporters after meeting with Senate Democrats to the legislation.

In a video posted on YouTube, as Biden speaks to reporters, Sinema can be seen emerging from a Senate room in the background. As soon as Sinema appears to see Biden, she turns around and walks in the other direction.

Under current Senate rules, at least 60 senators would need to support Biden’s election reform legislation for it to pass. With the 50-50 split in the Senate, Democrats would need at least 10 Republicans to support the bill for it to have any chance of passing. In order to bypass this, Biden has pushed for eliminating the filibuster, which would effectively allow Democrats to ram through their legislation.

On Thursday, Sinema announced that she did not support eliminating the filibuster to allow the bills to pass through the Senate.

“There’s no need for me to restate my longstanding support for the 60-vote threshold to pass legislation. There’s no need for me to restate its role in protecting our country from wild reversals of federal policy,” Sinema said, according to Fox News. “This week’s harried discussions about Senate rules are but a poor substitute for what I believe could have and should have been a thoughtful public debate at any time over the past year.”

“But what is the legislative filibuster, other than a tool that requires new federal policy to be broadly supported by senators, representing the broader cross-section of Americans… Demands to eliminate this threshold from whichever party holds the fleeting majority amount to a group of people separated on two sides of a canyon, shouting that solution to their colleagues,” she continued.

“These bills help treat the symptoms of the disease, but they do not fully address the disease itself. And while I continue to support these bills, I will not support separate actions that worsen the underlying disease of division affecting our country,” Sinema added.

“Some have given up on the goal of erasing our divisions and uniting Americans. I have not,” Sinema stated. “I’ve worked hard to demonstrate in my public service, the value of working with unlikely allies to get results.”