Connect with us

Politics

TERRELL: Democrats ‘are obsessed with racism’

Published

on

Nancy Pelosi said those who were involved in the Capitol riot chose “their whiteness over democracy.” 

In another great discussion with Larry Elder on Hannity Monday, Leo Terrell fired back. 

“I am sick and tired of the democrats playing the race card,” he said. “Pelosi says that people who marched in the Capitol have picked whiteness over democracy. What does race have to do with criminal conduct?” 

Terrell blasted Pelosi and the democrats for using race to further divide the country and distract from their lackluster policies. 

“The democrats and Pelosi focus on race for 1 reason: it divides this country and takes the attention away from their failures,” he urged. “They don’t have any policies, they don’t have any programs. But they play the race card even when the race card isn’t played.” 

He added that the race card is the exact reason why many are leaving the democratic party. 

“Joe Biden said that black lives matter. I’m just telling you, they’re obsessed with racism and that’s why a lot of people got used to it and we left the democratic party and we’re over here with the republicans because Trump has enlarged the party,” he said. 

“But the democrats are obsessed with race.” 

Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. DUANE FOGLE

    January 12, 2021 at 9:55 am

    THANK YOU, TERRELL!! OUR LORD SPEAKS THROUGH YOU♥️????????????????????

  2. Cynthia Corson

    January 12, 2021 at 9:58 am

    I was there! Peaceful support for election integrity. I, saw with my eyes, people spread out through out the crowd encouraging everyone to “MOVE FORWARD” using a bull horn.

  3. Ron Romine

    January 13, 2021 at 12:16 pm

    Amazing I used to hate when Tucker, Sean and Laura had you on. As a long ago Democrat I support your move over. The Republican Party has changed alot with President Trump. I still love alot of what Reagan did but love Trump more. I hope with your voice we make it through the next 4 years.

  4. John Wilch (TSGT, USAF Ret.)

    January 13, 2021 at 1:00 pm

    Mr. Terrell, I agree with you 100% on Pelosi and her ilk using the race card all the bloody time. I’m sick and tired of it and can’t stand it and wish that they’d set back and take a look at themselves for one. They’re white and they keep up with this idiotic junk about race. I was taught when I was growing up to look at a person’s ability not their skin color. We’re all the same in God’s eyes.

    I served with people of all races and religions and knew that we had one thing in common and that was that we loved this country and all her freedoms with all our hearts. “MY COUNTRY RIGHT OR WRONG. LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT!”

    I know we have people that hate people of different color or race, and I for one just dislike these fools for that. I dedicate most of my adult life, 27+years in uniform, defending their right to be stupid and idiotic. Enlisted at 17 years old on Dec 20, ’63 and retired Apr 1, ’92, would do it again because I love this country with all my heart and my OATH will never, never expire!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Media

National Public Radio Discontinues Reading the Declaration of Inependence

Published

on

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A post by Todd Starnes alerts that National Public Radio (NPR) has ditched its annual ritual of reading the Declaration of Independence. NPR, derisively referred to by Starnes as “National Public Welfare Radio,” announced the cessation of reading the Declaration. Which staffers at the taxpayer-funded radio network had been reading aloud the document since 1988.

The void that would have resulted from not reading the Declaration was not unfilled. “Instead, NPR broadcast an 11-minute conversation about whether or not the Founding Fathers actually meant the words “all men are created equal.” Here’s a link if you’d like to listen to their “screed” (which also reminds us frequently that many of the Founding Fathers owned slaves).

Starnes disclosed that he owns “KWAM, the leading news talk radio station in Memphis, Tennessee. It angers me that my tax dollars are used to prop up a broadcast competitor that spits on our Founding Fathers and our Founding Documents.”

Interestingly, NPR’s newly voiced contempt and cynicism for the Declaration of Independence does not encompass refusing taxpayer-funded government support. Whether or not the Founding Fathers meant what they said and what they wrote may be grist for energetic banter on a radio program that is increasingly committed to shrill progressive virtue signaling. However, the topic of this discussion among smug well-remunerated media activists is irrelevant. The words of the Founding Fathers have been inspirational for two hundred and forty-six years and have been the moral and legal foundation used to free the slaves and develop Constitutional principles to ensure that slavery can never be implemented in this country. Slavery currently exists in several countries now, but NPR is dedicated to ignoring that scourge.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Every Word Of This Is False’: Ted Cruz Factchecks Ilhan Omar’s Attack On Coach Kennedy Prayer Case

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar

On Monday night, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) factchecked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) after she made multiple false claims about the Supreme Court ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, in which the Court ruled 6-3 that a public high school football coach in Washington state had his First Amendment rights violated when he was punished by his school district for praying on the field after games where students could see.

As previously reported, “In 2008, high school football coach Joseph Kennedy began a tradition of praying at midfield after each game. Over time, his players and even members of the opposing team began to join him. In September 2015, a school administrator addressed the matter with Kennedy after an opposing team complained and the coach briefly stopped his prayers.”

“On October 14, 2015, Kennedy told the school district that he was planning on resuming his prayer tradition at the next game. The school district told the coach that his prayers violated the district’s policy, but Kennedy continued to pray at the next two games. The school district subsequently placed him on administrative leave, banned him from participating in the football program, and refused to renew his contract for the following season. Kennedy took the issue to federal district court, arguing that the school district had violated his First Amendment rights,” the report added.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Kennedy, Omar tweeted, “The Supreme Court just ruled that public school teachers can pressure students to join in prayer at public school events but can also retaliate against those that don’t join in. Religious freedom is dead in America.”

“Every word of this is false,” Cruz responded.

Omar’s claim that the Supreme Court’s decision allowed to teachers to “pressure students to join prayer” is false. The Court’s ruling just protected Coach Kennedy’s religious freedom to pray publicly.

Omar was also incorrect in claiming that there would be retaliation against students who did not join Kennedy in prayer – the coach’s tradition of praying after games began with him praying alone at midfield after football games. Kennedy’s school district even noted that Kennedy had “not actively encouraged, or required, participation.”

Additionally, in contrast to Omar’s claim that “religious freedom is dead in America,” the Supreme Court ruling actually strengthened protections of religious freedom.

Writing for the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained, “Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic—whether those expressions take place in a sanctuary or on a field, and whether they manifest through the spoken word or a bowed head.”

“Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance doubly protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment,” Gorsuch added. “And the only meaningful justification the government offered for its reprisal rested on a mistaken view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. Mr. Kennedy is entitled to summary judgment on his First Amendment claims.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List