Connect with us

Politics

VP Harris Defensive After Tha God Asks ‘Who is the Real President of This Country’

‘Don’t start talking like a Republican,’ Harris answered after Charlamagne suggested Manchin was in the driver’s seat in D.C.

Published

on

Vice President Kamala Harris was asked a pointed question we all want answered: “who is the real president of this country?” The question was asked by TV host Charlamagne Tha God on his Comedy Central show “Tha God’s Honest Truth.” Harris, who was clearly aggravated by the question, got defensive.

“I want to know who the real president of this country is — is it Joe Biden, or Joe Manchin?” Charlamagne asked. The two were discussing Democratic Senator Manchin’s opposition to some of the spending in the legislation brought by Democrats being debated on Capitol Hill.

“C’mon, Charlamagne,” she said. “No, no, no, no, it’s Joe Biden,” she repeated as she was clearly disappointed in the host’s insinuation. Harris then resorts to typical ‘go-to’ tactics by liberals and name calls, using the worst word they can think of…Republican. Gasp.

“And don’t start talking like a Republican, about asking whether or not he’s president. … And it’s Joe Biden, it’s Joe Biden and I’m vice president and my name is Kamala Harris,” she demanded.

Harris continued to say Democrats only have a small majority in the Senate and said the Republicans were united in opposition. Deflecting again, Harris said, “I think it’s a mistake to try and think about this only through the lens of Democrats versus Democrats when the fact is Republicans are consistently and unanimously standing in the way of progress.”

She then said Democrats have spending plans in the bill such as the child tax credit, which she claimed will lower “Black child poverty by 50%.” She added, “I hear the frustration, but let’s not deny the impact that we’ve had and agree also that there is a whole lot more work to be done and it is not easy to do.”

“We will not give up and I will not give up” Harris added.

Continue Reading
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Todd Lowe

    December 20, 2021 at 10:43 am

    What a joke she is. I think she knows inside she is incompetent and entitled; part of the reason she laughs off direct questions and also gets defensive when she needn’t be.

  2. DUANE Fogle

    December 20, 2021 at 1:45 pm

    THE WHOLE BODY OF WORK THAT KAMALA
    HARRIS IS SUMMED UP BY TWO WORDS,
    “ACCUMULATIVELY REPULSIVE.”

    • DUANE Fogle

      December 20, 2021 at 1:48 pm

      KAMALA HARRIS IS SO NARROW MINDED.
      SHE TRULY BELIEVES EVERYONE IS AS STUPID AND IGNORANT AS SHE IS!!

  3. Andie

    December 20, 2021 at 2:03 pm

    The Dems continue to throw money at poverty and think it solves the cycle. How about giving those in poverty a hand up instead of a hand out…like a job?

  4. John

    December 20, 2021 at 11:37 pm

    Let’s face it Kamala Harris, congress is clueless in how to write a clean bill!

  5. Mary

    December 24, 2021 at 4:43 pm

    Lowering “Black child poverty by 50%” is malarkey. A large majority of black children do not have a working father in the household. Shame shame on the single black mothers producing all of these illegitimate fatherless children. And the same goes to other races producing illegitimate children. One child is acceptable for a single mom but no more. Working Americans are tired of paying for children who are not theirs. This is why I do not support any child tax credit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Media

National Public Radio Discontinues Reading the Declaration of Inependence

Published

on

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A post by Todd Starnes alerts that National Public Radio (NPR) has ditched its annual ritual of reading the Declaration of Independence. NPR, derisively referred to by Starnes as “National Public Welfare Radio,” announced the cessation of reading the Declaration. Which staffers at the taxpayer-funded radio network had been reading aloud the document since 1988.

The void that would have resulted from not reading the Declaration was not unfilled. “Instead, NPR broadcast an 11-minute conversation about whether or not the Founding Fathers actually meant the words “all men are created equal.” Here’s a link if you’d like to listen to their “screed” (which also reminds us frequently that many of the Founding Fathers owned slaves).

Starnes disclosed that he owns “KWAM, the leading news talk radio station in Memphis, Tennessee. It angers me that my tax dollars are used to prop up a broadcast competitor that spits on our Founding Fathers and our Founding Documents.”

Interestingly, NPR’s newly voiced contempt and cynicism for the Declaration of Independence does not encompass refusing taxpayer-funded government support. Whether or not the Founding Fathers meant what they said and what they wrote may be grist for energetic banter on a radio program that is increasingly committed to shrill progressive virtue signaling. However, the topic of this discussion among smug well-remunerated media activists is irrelevant. The words of the Founding Fathers have been inspirational for two hundred and forty-six years and have been the moral and legal foundation used to free the slaves and develop Constitutional principles to ensure that slavery can never be implemented in this country. Slavery currently exists in several countries now, but NPR is dedicated to ignoring that scourge.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Every Word Of This Is False’: Ted Cruz Factchecks Ilhan Omar’s Attack On Coach Kennedy Prayer Case

Published

on

Rep. Ilhan Omar

On Monday night, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) factchecked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) after she made multiple false claims about the Supreme Court ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, in which the Court ruled 6-3 that a public high school football coach in Washington state had his First Amendment rights violated when he was punished by his school district for praying on the field after games where students could see.

As previously reported, “In 2008, high school football coach Joseph Kennedy began a tradition of praying at midfield after each game. Over time, his players and even members of the opposing team began to join him. In September 2015, a school administrator addressed the matter with Kennedy after an opposing team complained and the coach briefly stopped his prayers.”

“On October 14, 2015, Kennedy told the school district that he was planning on resuming his prayer tradition at the next game. The school district told the coach that his prayers violated the district’s policy, but Kennedy continued to pray at the next two games. The school district subsequently placed him on administrative leave, banned him from participating in the football program, and refused to renew his contract for the following season. Kennedy took the issue to federal district court, arguing that the school district had violated his First Amendment rights,” the report added.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Kennedy, Omar tweeted, “The Supreme Court just ruled that public school teachers can pressure students to join in prayer at public school events but can also retaliate against those that don’t join in. Religious freedom is dead in America.”

“Every word of this is false,” Cruz responded.

Omar’s claim that the Supreme Court’s decision allowed to teachers to “pressure students to join prayer” is false. The Court’s ruling just protected Coach Kennedy’s religious freedom to pray publicly.

Omar was also incorrect in claiming that there would be retaliation against students who did not join Kennedy in prayer – the coach’s tradition of praying after games began with him praying alone at midfield after football games. Kennedy’s school district even noted that Kennedy had “not actively encouraged, or required, participation.”

Additionally, in contrast to Omar’s claim that “religious freedom is dead in America,” the Supreme Court ruling actually strengthened protections of religious freedom.

Writing for the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained, “Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic—whether those expressions take place in a sanctuary or on a field, and whether they manifest through the spoken word or a bowed head.”

“Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet, personal religious observance doubly protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment,” Gorsuch added. “And the only meaningful justification the government offered for its reprisal rested on a mistaken view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. Mr. Kennedy is entitled to summary judgment on his First Amendment claims.”

Continue Reading

Leo's Hot List